Search for: "Francies v. Francies" Results 761 - 780 of 1,819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2015, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As Francis Pileggi put it in a May 6, 2015 post on his Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation blog (here), Laster’s opinion in Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:39 am
 The latter was a decision which, Judge Vajda explained, was in no small part due to UK Advocate General Francis Jacobs’s Opinion in that case. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York May 30, 2014) (Magistrate Judge James Francis IV). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
After Francis Shivers was convicted of “violating a restraining order and electronically distributing a harassing message” in violation of, respectively, California Penal Code  §§273.6(a) and 653.2(a), he appealed. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am by Leisha Bond, St Philips
As stated in North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 he ‘is not an insurer against all hazards’. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:29 pm
Perette's ex-husband, Francis Shivers, does not come out looking well in the opinion. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am by Giles Peaker
” The Court reminded itself of the high threshold for a mandatory, rather than prohibitory injunction, of a ‘strong prima facie case’, via Francis V Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2003] 1 WLR 2248, then went on to the criteria for the exercise of the discretion to accommodate pending appeal in R v Camden London Borough Council ex parte Mohammed [1997] 30 HLR 315. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v Horton, 9 AD3d 503 [3rd Dept… [read post]