Search for: "Haire v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In response, the father argued that he was not obligated to submit to a hair follicle test. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm
Thompson (Prison Hair Length Policies, Native American Religious Freedom)United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlSprint Communications Company L.P. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 3:43 am
The league does, however, expect teams to abide by applicable state and federal employment statutes. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:17 am
EDISON, Inc., v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:39 am
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court held (Holt v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
The competing products in this case are shown below, with Moroccanoil’s leading hair oil product on the right (price: £30 a go) and Aldi’s copycat below, left (a snip at £4 a bottle). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:05 am
Supreme Court earlier this year decided Holt v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 12:36 pm
Supreme Court’s June decision in EEOC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:14 am
” Not surprisingly, the court paid particular attention to the recent EEOC decision in Complainant v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:09 pm
It was so bad, he stated he did not want any more chemo if this was what he had to look forward to every time. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:35 am
The recent case of Doe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:28 pm
In the case, Li v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The case is Gabriele v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:02 am
With her wild, frizzy hair and earthy clothes, Levy looks like an aging hippie. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:41 pm
But in today’s 5-4 decision in Patel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
(Jones v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:18 am
It happened to this guy.The case is United States v. [read post]
