Search for: "Havens v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 3,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2015, 3:45 pm
")It's not that other judges haven't used a similar appellation in the past. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:53 pm
 "Frotteuristic disorder,"  Haven't heard that term before. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am by Dave
The Court of Appeal have refused permission to appeal in Brent LBC v Stokes [2010] EWCA Civ 626 (not on Baili yet) - we reported the High Court judgment here, which contains the summary of the facts and the important decision of King J. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am by Dave
The Court of Appeal have refused permission to appeal in Brent LBC v Stokes [2010] EWCA Civ 626 (not on Baili yet) - we reported the High Court judgment here, which contains the summary of the facts and the important decision of King J. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:14 pm
He also wondered how online speech could receive the same level of protection as offline speech, and specifically referenced Marsh v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm by Eric Goldman
New Haven Advocate, 315 F.3d 256 (4th Cir. 2002), the court dismisses FireClean’s claims for lack of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm by Nicandro Iannacci
The Constitution says that Congress (and the States) may not abridge the right to free speech. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 5:01 am by Ilya Shapiro
Still, the battle has been joined.The post <i>Lawless</i> V: Where Do We Go from Here? [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:00 pm
Thirty eight states have no juveniles currently on Death Row and 43 states haven't executed a juvenile since 1976. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
 A combination of at least four things leads me to that conclusion:First, there’s a small chance the Court might conclude that the case is moot or that the Court lacks statutory jurisdiction, even though the parties haven’t raised those jurisdictional issues. [read post]
11 May 2018, 12:31 am by Florian Mueller
While I'm not going to reiterate my positions on copyrightability and "fair use" in connection with Oracle v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This state-of-mind test applies in other Circuits, and now it applies in the Second Circuit. [read post]