Search for: "In Re An"
Results 761 - 780
of 368,908
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2012, 1:38 pm
Re-establishing bloaters in Lake Ontario will diversify the fish community, adding stability to the lake's ecosystem and sport fisheries. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 7:27 am
Thus obviating the marriage penalty while still getting all the benefits.You just have to make sure you're spouse is up for it. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:36 pm
Given the timeframes involved with processing TPS re-registration applications, however, USCIS recognizes that not all re-registrants will receive new EADs before their current EADs expire. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:03 pm
Sherill Huff, Elections Director for King County, Washington, announced she will not seek re-election after six years in office. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:48 am
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 60 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Re A Child [2013] UKSC 60 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
On March 14, 2010, the United States Department of State issued a travel advisory raising warning flags re travel to Mexico. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:57 am
Richard Re delivered an excellent keynote lecture entitled "The One Big Question. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:07 am
From the case:Since we have affirmed the rejections of claims 1, 3-5, 9, 16, 19, 20,22, and 23 that relied upon Boyles, Rivest, Fielding, and Anderson, it isunnecessary for us to reach the additional rejections of those claims relyingon different references.See In re Swanson, 540 F.3d 1368, 1374 (Fed. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
On that basis, it does not matter which party discharges the re-sale right, as long as one of them does. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:51 am
In re J (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) [2012] EWCA Civ 380; [2012] WLR (D) 111 In looking to the threshold criteria identified within section 31 of the Children Act 1989, and addressing the problem of the unidentified perpetrator of violence to a child or children where the pool of perpetrators was limited, the courts had to apply, with great care, the authorities in the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, where it was mooted that such authority was not compatible with… [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 3:30 am
Continue reading "Sharing and the City: Re-imagining Regeneration for America’s Urban Core"The post Sharing and the City: Re-imagining Regeneration for America’s Urban Core appeared first on Jotwell. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:06 pm
October 10, 2008 Re: Creating And Sustaining The Unsustainable. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:58 am
“We hold that such re-registration is not a ‘registration’ within the meaning of § 1125(d)(1). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Thus, the requirements of Rule 136(1) and (2) EPC are met and the request for re-establishment of rights is admissible.Allowability of the request for re-establishment of rights4. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
Justice Masley viewed this to be a distinction with a significant difference, writing that “dismissals for failure to adequately allege demand futility [a]re on the merits and entitled to res judicata effect. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:23 am
In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 988 (CAFC 2006). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit decided the In re Beineke case recently, affirming a decision by the USPTO's Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences that applicant Walter Beineke was not entitled to a patent for two strains of white oak trees under the Plant Patent Act of 1930 (as last amended in 1954). [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 1:15 pm
However, the recent case of In re Stanford shows that this can be a double-edged sword, having the potential to both undermine an application and to ruin an opinion that could otherwise have shed light on several of the thorniest open questions in patent eligibility jurisprudence. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:21 pm
In re: Rankin, No. 10-62340-13 (Bankr. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Last week, the Delaware Court of Chancery held – In re Volcano Corp. [read post]
