Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 761 - 780
of 29,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 4:13 am
In re Adorama, Inc., Serial No. 97263050 (February 9, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark A. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 2:20 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Currie, Serial No. 87221626 (September 17, 2018) [not precedential] [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark show below, for "amplifiers" [TONE AMPLIFIER disclaimed], in view of the registered mark ULTRATONE for "Audio equipment, namely, keyboard amplifiers and public address (PA) systems”].In re DIYAUTOFTW LLC, Serial No. 87330708 (September 17, 2018) [not precedential] [Section 2(d) refusal of the… [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:35 am
In re ProBleu, Inc., Serial No. 88310811 (May 4, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
Precedential No. 2: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register Proposed Multi-Color Mark for Breakfast Cereals
9 Jan 2024, 4:16 am
See In re Owens-Corning, 227 USPQ 417, 424 (Fed. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 pm
Gov’t Letter Br. 14, In re Brunetti, No. 15-1109,Docket No. 60 (Fed. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 12:02 am
Maxoly, Inc., 91 USPQ2d 1594 (TTAB 2009) (re-designated as precedential, July 31, 2009). [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
"Apart from the obviously distasteful nature of the possible use of the reported applications as trade marks, says the IPKat, there's a question as to whether a trade mark attorney, asked by a client to register such a mark, should simply execute the client's instructions on the basis that, if he or she didn't, someone else would -- or should something be said along the lines of "don't you think that what you're doing is really… [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
Brigadier General Mark Martins is, at this hour, giving the following address to the New York City Bar Association: Remarks of Brigadier General Mark Martins Chief Prosecutor, Military Commissions To the New York City Bar Association Tuesday, January 10, 2011 “Legitimacy and Comparative Law in Reformed Military Commissions” Good evening, and thank you, Jim, for that generous introduction and for the warm hospitality you have shown Kate and me and our… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:26 pm
And especially, if the governmental authorities, like the police try to use their might to acquite land using this doctrine, it is the most tragic – in the Supreme Court’s words – “a testament to the absurdity of the law and a black mark upon the justice system’s legitimacy“. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:15 am
That you’re going to make mistakes. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:38 am
In re Kumho Tire Co., Serial No. 77377089 (November 12, 2010) [not precedential].Applicant contended that PLATINUM is a weak mark because the term is laudatory and therefore entitled to a limited scope of protection; that ECSTA is the dominant portion of its mark; and that the ECSTA LX portion is sufficient to distinguish the marks. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:41 am
I'm just after the 4 minute mark if you're impatient. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 2:38 am
In re International Christian Broadcasting, Inc., Serial No. 85058128 (March 29, 2012) [not precedential].Click on photo for larger specimen.The Examining Attorney contended that the specimen shows the mark being used on point-of-sale materials - i.e., as a trademark for the adjacent goods. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 8:37 am
The following reasoning was applied: When hearing an appeal for Trade Marks Registry, the court was conducting a review and not a re-hearing (REEF TM [2003] RPC 101) It is possible for a party to have made no real use of a mark for a period of 5 years, but to have retained goodwill in the name sufficient to support a passing off action (Ad-Lib Club v Granville [1972] PRC 673 and Sutherland v V2 Music Limited [2002] EMLR 2) In January 2006 the hearing officer was… [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 7:30 am
Here it is, kids: a porte-cochère! [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:52 pm
It’s like a bird marking its territory where you hear the signal and you go, 'OK, this is not for me. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
When Will Connecticut Courts Re-open? [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:13 am
”] In re Forage Holdings LLC, Serial No. 87561681 (July 2, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:14 am
March 14, 2017 -11 AM: In re S & T Bank, Serial No. 86590754 et al. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
In re Franco Ferrari, S.r.l., Serial No. 76545104 (January 8, 2009) [not precedential].The Board agreed with Examining Attorney John Hwang that Applicant Franco Ferrari, S.r.L. was seeking to register the words FRANCO FERRARI in a stylized font, and that Applicant's mark "is not so extreme or highly stylized that the wording in the mark is unrecognizable or that it is essentially a design mark which conveys a distinct impression separate from the words. [read post]
