Search for: "In re TM" Results 761 - 780 of 1,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2011, 4:37 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
[ Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by John L. Welch
TTABlog Tweets and Re-TweetsTTAB Posts January 2011 Hearing Schedule7th Circuit Rules That Sovereign Immunity Shields State from TM Infringement Counterclaim in Action for Review of TTAB DecisionText ©John L. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
You’re SOL,” Says DOJ - http://tinyurl.com/6yhhzju (Christopher Dize) CEO Ruyak Partly Blames Contingency-Fees, eDiscovery Vendors, for Howrey’s Fall - http://tinyurl.com/4hunqua (Ashby Jones) Certification Gives Veteran Litigator a Reliable Standard to Vet Talent - http://tinyurl.com/47kjbtz (David Quinones) Civil Contempt and Possible $500,000 Sanction for Withholding of ESI by Defendant - http://tinyurl.com/4ept6o6 (John Blumenshein) Court Rules Debt Agency Can't… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm by Eric
Well, if you're going to have to use the Sleekcraft test to evaluate likely confusion, exactly what work does the initial interest confusion doctrine do? [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:00 am
  The First Defendant was a subcontractor to the Third Defendant, and the Second Defendant was responsible for re- marking lane lines on the motorway. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under ‘preponderance’ standard: Alexsam… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(This is why I think his analysis of Brandir is wrong; this is a TM functionality analysis, and a pretty cabined one at that.) [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Surprised by conclusion that we should treat people as rational when we know they’re not. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The consumer protection at the base of TM policy is source quality, not moral quality. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Structuring assumption: need of patent system to distinguish protectable from unprotectable reigns supreme in conflict with TM and copyright. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Another TM case, apology requested but denied. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
  In particular, an illustrative example regarding Regulation 4.22(e)(2) is available in CFTC Interpretative Letter 94-3 (http://www.cftc.gov/tm/tm94-03.htm), Special Allocations of Investment Partnership Equity. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:38 pm by Kevin
It seems like signing your name is not something you would forget when your name is what you're trying to trademark, but she's a busy woman. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm by Kenneth Anderson
 We are used to re-thinking law in terms of economics. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:56 am by Eric
If you're going to wave the "Search Neutrality" flag, please keep it hypocrisy-free [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm by Maria Roche
 Initially, it was clear that TM objected to TTM’s admission but by the third call the AMHP honestly but mistakenly concluded TM no longer objected. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Kelly
(TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 50: TTAB says consent and license from registrant require reversal of 2(d) refusal of WACKER NEUSON over NEUSON for Machinery –  In re Wacker Neuson SE (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 1: TTAB affirms 2(e)(5) functionality refusal of motorcycle stand design: In re Charles N. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
Celebrity LeveragingRobert Raskopf, partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP was up after the coffee break discussing the exploitation of celebrity rights in the US. [read post]