Search for: "In the Matter of Perry"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2015, 7:27 am
In Matter of Nemeth v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 3:05 pm
Why does this matter? [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:20 am
Like something out of a bad Katy Perry song, LeMunyon then contacted the plaintiff, William F. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 am
As such, ownership is not simply a matter of determining who designed the costume or choreographed the dance. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:13 am
(BTW, let me renew Grits' kudos to former Governor Perry for voting against their installation at the time.) [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
Non-Standard Deviations The First Deviation – Changing the Ascertainment Period After the Data Are Collected The protocol apparently identified a primary endpoint to be: “the mean increase in [copper 65] excretion in fecal matter above the baseline (mg/day) averaged over the study period … to test the hypothesis that the release of [zinc] either from Fixodent or Zinc Acetate impairs [copper 65] absorption as measured in feces. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
That circuit is bustin out entrapment cases like Taylor Swift and Katy Perry bust out insults of each other. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 12:53 pm
Zhu, 2013 BCCA 352, 366 D.L.R. (4th) 443, Madam Justice Newbury for the Court adopted this description from Perry v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 8:53 am
"No matter who you are, Katy Perry’s sharks just get you. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Perry (one of the same-sex marriage cases), the Court used questionable reasoning (even if its result was correct) to make it hard for proponents of initiatives to defend those initiatives in federal court when elected state officials decline to defend. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:28 am
And I'm unsure if increasing the number of bills passed each session was Patrick's intent, even if it's a likely consequence.No matter. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
Perry, 2004-Ohio-297 (Under the harmless-error standard of review, the government bears the burden of demonstrating that the error did not affect the substantial rights of the defendant.) [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 am
On TV, no matter how dire, how dramatic, there was ultimately justice. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 5:20 am
“Since they received extra credit, they were probably all taking the same class from one of the professors who wrote the paper,” Perry wrote. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
Rick Perry vetoed a dark money disclosure measure last session. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In my last column, I described a cherished American myth: When we imagine our security threatened, we lose our collective heads and engage in reprehensible behavior, which affords us the calming illusion that a strong hand is at the helm. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In my last column, I described a cherished American myth: When we imagine our security threatened, we lose our collective heads and engage in reprehensible behavior, which affords us the calming illusion that a strong hand is at the helm. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
Perhaps courts can't base (or, at least, publicly admit that their basing their decisions) exclusively on "possible effects," but, going back to Marbury and foreword to the embarrassing decision a couple of years ago finding a lack of standing in Perry v. [read post]
