Search for: "L & G Productions" Results 761 - 780 of 1,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Plaintiffs claimed they would not have purchased the products had they "been aware of the fact ... that it was illegal for P&G to sell" them. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
We're working through the G-20 to sustain a lasting global recovery. [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Moderator Gary Ades, standing, is president of G&L Consulting and Chairman of the Food Safety Summit Educational Advisory Board. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:33 am by Eugene Volokh
(f) The name of the group shall not be the name of a special product or brand name, and shall not be construed, as determined by the cabinet, as promoting a product or brand name;  and (g) The group's lettering, logo, image, or message to be placed on the license plate, if created, shall not be obscene, as determined by the cabinet. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:05 pm by News Desk
The Town Hall will be moderated by Gary Ades, president of G&L Consulting Group and chairman of the Food Safety Summit Educational Advisory Board. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:57 am by Steven Hansen
Hatlelid, Ph.D., M.P.H., Toxicologist, Directorate for Health SciencesSUBJECT Request for Exclusion from Lead Limits under Section 101(b)(l) of theConsumer Product Safety Improvement Act from the Bicycle Product Suppliers AssociationIntroductionThe Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act provides for specific lead limits in children's products. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Carl Custer
ReferencesAlban, L., Poulsen, M.K., Petersen, J.V., Lindegaard, L.L., Meinert, L., Koch, A.G. and Møgelmose, V., 2022. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Beer Institute, Inc.[17] involved a Connecticut statute that required out-of-state beer shippers to affirm that prices posted for products sold to Connecticut wholesalers were, in the relevant period, no higher than prices in bordering states.[18] The Court invalidated these price affirmation schemes on the narrow grounds that they had the "practical effect of controlling . [read post]