Search for: "LIMB v. LIMB"
Results 761 - 780
of 859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
’” The Court seems to be daring us to go out on a limb and predict an opinion here. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 7:49 am
To meet this element, there must be a currently diagnosed problem, such as degenerative arthritis in a joint, or a DSM-V recognized mental health condition. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
: off-topic, but an interesting take on Grainger v Nicholson. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
In particular, it contended that it had terminated the Development Contract after Force India's repudiatory breach by persistent non-payment of sums due to it.The matter came before Arnold J in the Chancery Division of the High Court: Force India Formula One Team Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team SDN BHD & Ors [2012] EWHC 616 (Ch) (21 March 2012). [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am
Last week, Justice Kornreich released her 32-page decision in Zelouf International Corp. v Zelouf, 2014 NY Slip Op 51462(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Oct. 6, 2014], fixing the fair value of the 25% stock interest at $2.2 million and awarding additional “damages” of another $2.2 million on the “quasi-derivative” claims for waste and self-dealing. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Let me go out on a limb and say we will almost certainly have an answer within a couple of weeks – but odds are that a draft opinion is circulating. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Annab v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
The Court held as under:- "Bias is the second limb of natural justice. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry')) The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:00 am
EPA and American Electric Power v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
(“Daubert II”)(holding that for epidemiological testimony to be admissible to prove specific causation, there must have been a relative risk for the plaintiff of greater than 2) (“For an epidemiological study to show causation under a preponderance standard … the study must how that children whose mothers took Bendectin are more than twice as likely to develop limb reduction birth defects as children whose mothers did not. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 9:17 am
London Borough of Hackney v Weintraub (2024) EWCA Civ 1561 We saw this case on the conditions for the right to buy in the High Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Coakley and Riley v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 2:57 pm
Zhan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
The first was Freeman v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
