Search for: "LLOYD v. STATE" Results 761 - 780 of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The significance of this case should also be considered alongside the Court of Appeal’s judgment in another data protection-related claim, Richard Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (“Lloyd”) (see our summary of that decision here). [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Manchester Building Society (Appellant) v Grant Thornton UK LLP (Respondent), heard 13-14 October 2020 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others… [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am by Geoffrey
Bremer GmbH v. ets Soules et Cie and Anthony G Scott [1985] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 160 Disputes arose in connection with Bremer’s sale of US soya bean meal to Soules. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 1:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The August 5 Opinion On appeal, Citigroup attempted to rely on the holding of Zeig v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:31 am by Chip Merlin
  —Harper Lee in “To Kill a Mockingbird”   1Certain Underwriters at Lloyds’, London v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Lucia v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
”[6] The court’s stated standard is much less interesting than its reasoning process, which goes 2020. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am by CMS
Lord Hodge who gave the only judgment (with which Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows and Lady Rose agreed) stated (at [33]): “.. the purpose of section 471(3) is to circumvent the difficult issues that can arise in the application of section 471(1). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:35 am by Abbott & Kindermann
State Water Resources Control Board, Judge Lloyd Connelly of the Sacramento Superior Court issued a ruling on the issues on December 2, 2011 as follows. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:36 am
Auth. v Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 61 AD3d 726 [2009]).Can this decision withstand appellate scrutiny under Appellate Division decisions such as Matter of GMAC Ins. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am by Francis Davey
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for… [read post]