Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 88,143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
The third focuses cognitive control of target populations of competitor or target states (and other collectives) connected to "cold war. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:37 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:56 am
From North Carolina Lawyers Weekly: The trial court did not have a legal basis to order plaintiff to pay child support. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
Finally, sequential unmasking can lead to a significant increase in costs as the legal team will need to have several calls or meetings with a candidate before asking the crucial questions to discover if the expert is supportive of their client’s position. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm
Related Cases: Google v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am
The ADA was not intended to create equality by bringing everyone down to the same low level of participation in the economic and social life of the United States. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:45 am
The case is Jamie Allen Harless v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:14 am
Ball State University, where a student sued alleging a professor’s advances created a hostile learning environment, and Doe v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:29 am
Federal Trade Commission, 3:24-cv-986, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, filed April 23, 2024; Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
