Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 761 - 780
of 4,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
As the current Court term churns along and conferences and arguments are conducted and orders are issued, one case from last term--Madison County v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:30 pm
Earle Partington was the civilian defense counsel in both the trial and appeal of the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 5:18 am
The United States Supreme Court said as much as far back as 1998, in Bragdon v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am
Proc., § 474) in light of the city’s conduct. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:44 am
In Dent v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:57 am
SRI Int'l v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:15 pm
The Buyer asked to view the statements well before closing, but it did not take further action to verify or question the numbers prior to entering into the Agreement, even in light of its undisputed knowledge that an audit of the allegedly overbilled contract was in the offing. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 3:03 pm
” ShamrockTechs., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Hutchison v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm
Levine involved a traditional state-law claim and did not affect the inability of state-law plaintiffs to sue over FDCA violations having no parallel in state law.Lofton v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:46 pm
In Terry Williams v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:58 pm
Because the claims challenge the effectiveness of the training, they sound in educational malpractice and are barred as a matter of law.Glorvigen v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 10:11 am
In December, the justices heard argument in Moore v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
It’s been a time of great excitement for the Supreme Court bar. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
In the case (Latif v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 10:11 am
Watson v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
That problem just got much bigger with the Fourth Circuit’s decision in G.G. v. [read post]
