Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 761 - 780 of 14,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2020, 2:15 am by Nedim Malovic
In a recent decision, the General Court upheld the EUIPO Fifth Board of Appeal’s (the Board) findings regarding the likelihood of confusion between the two signs ‘MARK’ and ‘MARQ’.The General Court considered that there was a low degree of similarity between the goods in Class 11 covered by the Applicant’s mark and the ‘lighting mixers’ in Class 9 covered by the earlier mark. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Ilya Shapiro as part of SCOTUSblog symposium on NIFLA v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:18 am by gmlevine
The threshold requirement sets a low bar but small differences “can have a major effect on the way domain names are read,” Travellers Exchange Corporation Limited v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:17 am by lawmrh
As the old year closes and a New Year beckons, here’s a toast of low-end box wine to those television poetasters, the hackneyed lawyer rhymesters who make their colleagues blanch and elevate greeting card versifiers to the level of Wordsworth and Byron. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Smith v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The legislative history of the TMA, just enacted into law, includes several paragraphs blessing Rogers v. [read post]