Search for: "Marshall v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 2,548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
Constitution grants power to the federal government to regulate interstate commerce, and early on Chief Justice Marshall ruled that this implies that states cannot interfere with interstate commerce unless Congress explicitly permits them to do so. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:10 pm by Peter Margulies
” That observation dovetails with the Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In fact, the State of Maryland allowed someone to sue on its behalf pursuant to state law in the landmark case of McCullough v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:10 pm by Brian Tamanaha
The United States legal culture has swallowed whole a largely false account of our legal history. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:26 am by SHG
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a good ruling out of the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
Maryland, which, among other things, upheld Congress’s power to charter the Bank of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States, Sarah Friedman on  Hansberry v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
United States (1944) is usually cited as well,” Savage said. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
United States (1944) is usually cited as well,” Savage said. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Racial distinctions cannot exist in the machinery that selects the officers and lawmakers of the United States; and all citizens of this State and Country are entitled to cast a free and untrammeled ballot in our elections, and if the only material and realistic elections are clothed with the name “primary”, they are equally entitled to vote there. [read post]