Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Johnson"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2013, 7:18 am
There was one "quality assurance plan" (QAP) related to property matters from the case but she characterized it as relatively "benign." [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
If the case makes it beyond this threshold finding, the matter will be permitted to proceed to the jury for a determination as to whether a product’s design was defective and the cause of the injury alleged. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Johnson & Johnson, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals again predicts that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would adopt the Restatement (Third). [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 7:31 pm
More than that, though, we fear that the sweeping and preemptive militarization of counterterrorism for which they argue is not just unnecessary on current facts, but also deeply misguided—and likely counterproductive—as a matter of policy and prudence. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:39 am
Shalina Laboratories Pvt.Ltd and therefore orders the matter to be placed before a larger bench for further determination. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Mitchell, 11-9843 (the habeas case “essentially the same” as Johnson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
The Proposition 8 defenders nominally defend that outcome on page 28 of their brief (because the “natural capacity to create children . . . as a matter of indisputable biological fact is limited to sexual relationships between a man and a woman . . . the traditional definition of marriage satisfies the Equal Protection Clause under any standard of review, for even when heightened scrutiny applies, ‘[t]he Constitution requires that [a State] treat similarly situated… [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Johnson & Johnson, Inc., 31 A.3d 823, 836 (Pa. 2012), in which the appellee invited the Supreme Court to adopt the Restatement (Third), but the Pennsylvania Supreme Court declined the invitation, although it did acknowledge the “continuing state of disrepair” in this area. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Every now and then we run into a decision that we think is wrong in so many different ways that we call it an example of “spherical error” – that is, error no matter how one looks at it. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Thus John Perry Barlow's famous Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace, and Johnson and Post's Law and Borders: “The Net thus radically subverts a system of rule-making based on borders between physical spaces, at least with respect to the claim that cyberspace should naturally be governed by territorially defined rules. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:45 am
The Commissioner adopted the ALJ’s decision in its entirety. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
Johnson also addressed why a telephone number or internet address might be considered misleading in this advertising context: “To just see a phone number, it doesn't actually tell you what the business is or what you're doing. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:25 am
The parties raised several issues on appeal, but the SCOV dismisses a few offhand because they weren’t raised below—a punt maneuver it also adopted in the 2001 case around which today’s case revolves: In re Sealed Documents. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 12:32 pm
While this was arguably in service of a policy previously adopted by Congress, the president noted that “he had decided to act because it was ‘in the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
Johnson & Johnson, 41 A.2d 823 (Pa. 2012). [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm
Christine Oliver and Alison Johnson, “Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: Reflections” (Nov. 4, 2011). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
. for injuries caused by medical instruments, drugs or other substances used in treatment”), adopted in pertinent part, 2007 WL 915224 (D.D.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 3:14 am
The Supreme Court, after noting that the case was eight years old, offered to adjourn the matter until January 14. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:10 am
"This is a travesty and it's occurring around the country," said the Watts' family lawyer Roger Johnson of Johnson, Vorhees & Martucci in Joplin, Mo. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:07 pm
How much could that matter? [read post]
