Search for: "Matter of Andrew B."
Results 761 - 780
of 1,077
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 7:33 am
The New York Times on April 27, 2012 released the following: "By JAMES B. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Attorney for the District of New Jersey; and Michael B. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:59 pm
I happen to agree with CPA and wealth management advisor Andrew Rice, who has written Why You Still Shouldn't Gamble on Gift and Estate Taxes for AdvisorOne.com. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
See Judge Jack B. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 3:48 pm
Such thoughts occurred to me yesterday while working on more profitably productive matters. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:47 am
(B) Will the proposed form of information control require a significant increase in regulatory bureaucracy? [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm
Andrew A. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:36 am
Additional guidance on patent subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
This also reflects the FTC’s implicit adoption of the proportionality principle, proposed originally by our colleague Andrew Serwin in several papers. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Anderson & Laura B. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:08 am
Durick Respondent: Sarah Andrews Herman , Spec. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:33 am
International rulemaking must take into account matters of space security, space situational awareness, and well as re-entry of satellites. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:56 am
Posted on behalf of Alex Andrews and Jacqueline Zalapa. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:03 am
The good judge then exacerbated matters by trying to coerce a court manager into telling authorities a different story. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:58 am
In challenging the order issued by the Honorable Andrew J. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:17 pm
Throw it in the trash B. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:39 pm
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division.Child support -- Enforcement of administrative support order -- Error for court to reduce child support by deviating from guidelines based upon a verbal visitation agreement that was not court-authorizedDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O LEMEICIA L. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:43 pm
§ 271(e)(2) was sufficient to confer subject-matter jurisdiction on a federal district court regardless of the merits of the claim, and therefore dismissal under Rule 12(b)(1) is inappropriate in such circumstances. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
B or C. [read post]
