Search for: "Matter of Washington Group, Inc." Results 761 - 780 of 1,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2023, 4:46 am by Seán Binder
Hsu reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 6:51 pm by Arianna Morseau
Hybrid based in Los Angeles, San Francisco or Washington D.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am by Richard Altieri, Benjamin Della Rocca
Weltover, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that an action of a foreign sovereign has a “direct effect” only when the effect “follows as an immediate consequence of the defendant’s ... activity. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  And filming group scenes “like a public parade, or the 1963 March on Washington, would pose a huge burden if each of the thousands of marchers could claim an independent copyright. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:52 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
BRODWAY COMMERCE INC., 17 Calle A 7-21, Zona 10, Guatemala City, Guatemala; Registration ID 60832 (Guatemala) [SDNTK]. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
– Removal of diplomatic immunity and alleged smear campaign: (IPKat)    Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Working Group for the Legal Development of the Madrid System proposes replacement of ‘tacit acceptance’ regime: (Class 46), Global branding for a family-owned cult wine: can it be done? [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting that disparate impact claims under Title VII challenge “a facially neutral policy or practice that causes a disparate impact on a protected group, even if the employer has no intent to discriminate,” the court observed that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
In the course of identifying this second assumption, the Manual now points out that the doubling argument turns on applying “an average risk for the group” to each individual in the group. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm by Lyle Denniston
Keisler of the Washington, D.C., office of Sidley Austin. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas & Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly – four strategic… [read post]