Search for: "May v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc." Results 761 - 780 of 866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2014, 6:50 am by Greg Mersol
  Similarly, courts conditionally certifying classes often indicate that they cannot weigh the merits, but as reflected in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
Pay Less Drug Stores N.W., Inc., 918 F.2d 160, 161 (Fed. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Anybody can go down to the hardware store and buy a lawnmower for any reason (or no reason) at all. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
Mintz, supra.The Superior Court went on to explain that[p]laintiffs filed their complaint on May 18, 2010. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat) CFI: CTM grant not contrary to Portuguese business name ruling: Alberto Jorge Moreira da Fonseca, Lda v OHIM, General Óptica, SA, intervening (Class 46) CFI confirms refusal of Anheuser-Busch’s BUDWEISER Community trade mark: Anheuser-Busch v OHIM - Budejovicky Budvar (Class 46) (IPKat) (Law360) (Out-Law) ACTA negotiation powers for EU Commission (BLOG@IP::JUR) EU sound recording term extension vote delayed (Excess Copyright) EP divisional applications… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 160 F.3d 358, 359–60 (7th Cir. 1998) (Posner, C.J.) [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Metropolitan Opera, 841 N.E.2d 747, 749 (N.Y. 2005); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 766 N.E.2d 1118 (Ill. 2002) (actual knowledge of synergistic adverse effect of two drugs). [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:17 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 The ruling is noteworthy for two reasons: (i) Judge Weinstein has a track record of certifying class actions via "push the envelope" interpretations of Rule 23, and (ii) the rejection of the plaintiff's class certification theory in Haynes shows the power on the new commonality requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:44 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312, 1318 (Fed. [read post]