Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration" Results 761 - 780 of 2,564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
Recognizing the fecklessness of Trump’s barbs should give courts pause before elevating his social media over actual policy statements. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the court concluded that the statements were absolutely privileged and Supreme Court had properly granted the Defendants' motions for summary judgment.* In Hemmens v Nelson, 138 NY 517, the Court of Appeals explained "From considerations of public policy and to secure the unembarrassed and efficient administration of justice and public affairs, the law denies to the defamed party any remedy through an action for libel or slander in such… [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the court concluded that the statements were absolutely privileged and Supreme Court had properly granted the Defendants' motions for summary judgment.* In Hemmens v Nelson, 138 NY 517, the Court of Appeals explained "From considerations of public policy and to secure the unembarrassed and efficient administration of justice and public affairs, the law denies to the defamed party any remedy through an action for libel or slander in such… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Edward Craven, Matrix.
In Cart, the appellant had unsuccessfully appealed to the Social Security and Child Support Tribunal (whose jurisdiction has since been taken over by the First-tier Tribunal) against a decision of the Child Support Agency. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:25 pm
  Jenkins was also awarded disability benefits by the Social Security Administration. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am by Patricia Hughes
In some cases, internal limits have been read into the guarantee, making it easier for government to justify the infringement (see, for example, Withler v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
Not unconstitutional, said the Second Circuit in X-Men Security, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:03 am by Alvaro Marañon
  The technological architecture of different digital assets has substantial implications for privacy, national security, the operational security and resilience of financial systems, climate change, the ability to exercise human rights, and other national goals. [read post]