Search for: "Medical Associates, Inc., Appeal of" Results 761 - 780 of 1,714
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Many modern longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical trials use survival analysis and time windows to identify latency or time lagged outcomes in association with identified exposures. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
New law firm associates may not be interested in the traditional partnership track and therefore, existing pay-based work incentives do not appeal to them. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Bear Medical Systems, Inc., 883 P.2d 407, 415 (Ariz. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
When defendant MR moved in the Kings County action to transfer the lawsuit to Suffolk County, plaintiff's counsel ought to have made a formal cross motion to that effect and to have perfected an appeal from an adverse order, if plaintiff truly was aggrieved. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
The AEPD was sympathetic to medical evidence that the continued availability of the article was exacerbating his serious mental illness. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am by Schachtman
The court also noted that there were four medications known to be risk factors for IBD: aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs), oral contraceptives, and antibiotics. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
On 20 March 2015, HHJ Parkes QC (sitting in Salisbury) refused the defendant permission to appeal in the case of Rai v Bholowasia. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
” The patient may point to the fact that the health care scheme created by federal and provincial legislation draws a distinction between insured and non-insured services, leading to differential treatment between patients whose medical care is covered and those whose medical care is not. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm by MOTP
SUPERIOR RECHARGE SYSTEMS, LLC, Tex: Court of Appeals, 2nd Dist. 2013 RICHMONT HOLDINGS, INC., NUKOTE HOLDING, INC., NUKOTE INTERNATIONAL, INC., INKBRARY, LLC, SUPERIOR ACQUISITIONS LLC, JOHN P. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
SUPERIOR RECHARGE SYSTEMS, LLC, Tex: Court of Appeals, 2nd Dist. 2013 RICHMONT HOLDINGS, INC., NUKOTE HOLDING, INC., NUKOTE INTERNATIONAL, INC., INKBRARY, LLC, SUPERIOR ACQUISITIONS LLC, JOHN P. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:57 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled eight (VIII) oral hearings for the month of March, as listed below. [read post]