Search for: "NO PARTY V. NO PARTY" Results 761 - 780 of 120,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2019, 3:12 pm by Giles Peaker
Brown v Tyndale (2019) QBD (Robert Francis QC) 25/07/2019 (unreported, but note of extempore judgment on lawtel) The kind of thing that happens when neither party is represented… In December 2018, Mr Brown had obtained an ex parte injunction against Mr Tyndale, the landlord, on the basis that the landlord had attempted to lock him out of the property and remove his possessions. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 5:18 pm by Amy Howe
This evening the Supreme Court asked both sides in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 4:15 am by Andrea L. Arndt
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a pivotal decision in Snaprays (SnapPower) v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:52 am by The Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence of a third party software add-in as a proxy for the value of the patented technology. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:25 am
The court noted that the mistake was obvious because there was no way that Cromwell Associates could obtain any benefit by being listed as an additional insured. 137 Broadway Associates, LLC v. 602 West 137th Deli Corp. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Parties may negotiate pre-disciplinary suspension procedures in the course of collective bargainingTransport Workers Union of Greater N.Y. v Bianco, 2015 NY Slip Op 06041, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe Appellate Division said Supreme Court properly dismissed the Transport Workers Union's complaint alleging that the collective bargaining agreement provision setting forth procedures for pre-disciplinary suspensions was void under Civil Service Law §75. [read post]