Search for: "NORTH CAROLINA COURT SYSTEM"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2021, 9:30 pm
Durham Public School District and the Campaign for School Equalization, in the North Carolina Civil Rights Law Review:Plessy v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 2:49 pm
.; Robert Handfield,professor at North Carolina State University; Stephen Schondelmeyer, professor at the University of Minnesota; and Kimberly Glas, president and CEO of the National Council of Textile Organizations. [read post]
17 May 2021, 8:23 am
Catrow Law PLLC, No. 19-0361 from the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, illustrates this example. [read post]
10 May 2021, 10:08 am
The post Time to Manage Videoconferencing appeared first on North Carolina Bar Association. [read post]
7 May 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court rulings earlier in the decade – could transform that steady stream of lawsuits into a downpour. [read post]
6 May 2021, 11:08 am
” It’s not hard to imagine Facebook’s rule against “organized … criminal activity” getting misapplied to any plans for protests after curfews, whether in Kenosha, Wisconsin last summer or Elizabeth City, North Carolina today. [read post]
4 May 2021, 10:15 am
On March 1, former USPTO Director David Kappos, former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel, and Senator Thom Tillis from North Carolina also jointly filed an amicus brief, arguing that the “disparate and inconsistent application” of the current Section 101 jurisprudence has led to “an unpredictable and unstable” patent system. [read post]
3 May 2021, 7:10 am
North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein worried that the True Lender rule provides a get-out-of-jail-free card to predatory lenders, and claimed the rule exceeds the OCC’s authority – an argument addressed and refuted in detail by the OCC in the Supplementary Information accompanying the rule when published. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 10:50 am
The Court of Appeals of North Carolina issued a decision last week, In re D.A.H. ___ N.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:22 pm
Mississippi appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:18 am
” One North Carolina Supreme Court justice struck down the Confederate act, but he was quickly reversed, while in the North, a New York City judge and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court both declared conscription unconstitutional before being quickly reversed. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
North Carolina appellate courts have consistently held that jurors who express pro-prosecution bias are competent to serve when they commit to basing their judgments on the facts of the case. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
It also explores key developments in attempts to extend rental car excise taxes to app-based alternatives like peer-to-peer car sharing and the challenges associated with incorporating these new economy transportation options into state sales tax systems. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
But that may change after the North Carolina Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 10:20 am
Wednesday, April 21, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.: The House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East, North Africa and Global Counterterrorism will hold a hearing on the crisis in Yemen. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:17 am
In 1998, the North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s orders determining that all four children were neglected juveniles. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
North Carolina, the Court described “cyberspace . . . and social media in particular” as “the most important places . . . for the exchange of views. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 7:50 am
The post California Supreme Court Addresses Affordability of Money Bail appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 10:00 am
Weidemaier, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, has published Law, Lawyers, and Self-Governance During the Heyday of the London Stock Exchange in Law and Contemporary Problems 82 (2019): 195-223. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 9:05 pm
For example, a North Carolina appellate court in 2020 found “no evidence in the record that the trial court inquired at the beginning of the proceeding whether any participant knew or had reason to know that an Indian child was involved”—despite the Interior Department’s instructions to conduct such an inquiry. [read post]
