Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon" Results 761 - 780 of 1,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2021, 3:58 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Los residenciamientos han sido objeto de diversos litigios, como el caso Nixon v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 8:02 am by Richard Frank
Supreme Court is currently wrestling with that jurisdictional issue in a major CWA case–Sackett v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Van Waeyenberghe, 990 F.2d 845, 848 (5th Cir.1993) (quoting Nixon v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:24 pm by Sandy Levinson
  But I've also noted that both Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton got to the Oval Office with only around 43% of the total popular vote. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 7:36 am by Lovechilde
  As a result, Republicans have had a majority on the Supreme Court since the Nixon Administration, and have truly come to believe that this is how it must always be. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:40 pm by Amul Kalia and Vera Eidelman
  Though this change appears to be part of PACER’s attempt to join the 21st Century—the removal is part of PACER’s migration to its NextGen system, which is incompatible with the decades-old legacy systems holding these records—it stands in sharp contrast to the Supreme Court’s acknowledgement in Nixon v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:15 pm by José Guillermo
El congresista De Belaunde cita para amparar su petición de expulsión –no en este comentario-de Martha Huatay del Colegio de Abogados de Lima (CAL) las decisiones que en su momento recayeron en Nixon y Clinton, aquel por el caso Watergate fue expulsado y a éste suspensión por mentir en el caso Lewitski AMBOS TRAICIONARON LA ÉTICA y De Belaunde pretende asimilar la conducta de Huatay como traición a la ética. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
The war in Vietnam was moving towards an inglorious end, while the Watergate scandal led to the resignation of President Nixon. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
  The Title X program dates back to 1970 when, at President Nixon’s urging, a bipartisan Congress enacted it to improve access to family planning and to make birth control like “the pill” and IUDs available to all regardless of their income. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  (Another opinion in the file is Douglas’s dissent from the dismissal of Massachusetts v. [read post]