Search for: "ORDER AMENDING THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE COURT"
Results 761 - 780
of 10,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
" However, over thirty-five years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that witnesses can be compelled to give immunized testimony even if they assert their Fifth Amendment right not to be witnesses against themselves: "[T]he immunity provided by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 7:29 am
Even if the TC Heartland decision was an intervening change in law, the 'omission of improper venue from [a party]'s first 12(b) motion constitutes a "procedural misstep,"' which precludes a party from '"invok[ing] intervening Supreme Court case law" in order to "correct" it.'. . . [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:53 am
The Commission's stay order provides that the stay of the effective date of the amendments to Rule 14a-8 and related rules will expire without further Commission action when the court's decision is finalized, which is expected to be September 13. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 1:01 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court ruling will allow procedural BIPA violations to proceed (and multiply) in state court – and has reportedly already prompted parties to settle such actions. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm
The Florida Supreme Court recently ratified a significant change to the state's mediation procedures found in Rule 1.720 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 5:05 am
The court cited Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 3a(1) that "Each administrative judicial region, district court, county court, county court at law, and probate court may make and amend local rules governing practice before such courts, provided: (1) that any proposed rule or amendment shall not be inconsistent with these rules or with any rule of the administrative… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
Wells, supra, on which the Supreme Court of Florida relied in affirming the supression order in this case. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
Wells, supra, on which the Supreme Court of Florida relied in affirming the supression order in this case. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:58 am
The court did not decide what procedures courts should use when a defendant seeks a new trial based on testimony that one or more jurors was racially biased, nor did it weigh in on what standard courts should use in deciding whether to order a new trial in such circumstances. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
Image via WikipediaIn In re Does, __S.W.3d __ , 2011 WL 1447544 (Texas 2011), the Lone Star State's High Court quashed subpoenas issued to Google to unmask two anonymous bloggers facing claims of defamation, invasion of privacy and copyright infringement.Pursuant to Rule 202.1 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, an individual may petition the court for an order authorizing a deposition: "(a) to perpetuate or obtain the person's… [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:28 pm
This rule is part of our ‘deep-rooted historic tradition that everyone should have his own day in court. [read post]
25 May 2017, 11:20 am
Ruling provides guidance.Although many lawyers believe that anything after a trial on the merits is appealable under Code of Civil Procedure Section 904.1(a)(2), it is well established that temporary custody orders are not appealable. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:05 pm
It also maintains the secrecy rule violates the First Amendment rights of the telecommunication companies. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:53 pm
The proposed rules would also adopt processes related to depositions that are similar to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm
The ordered rules and regulations, yet to be developed by the FAR Council, may provide additional basis for challenge of this Order. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Ginsburg had faith in the proverbial “day in court. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
One of the appeals was Robert Hryniak’s motion to set aside the summary judgment ordered by the Superior Court of Justice based on the amended rule. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
The court therefore vacated the trial judge’s amended-corrected order. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
The court therefore vacated the trial judge’s amended-corrected order. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 4:05 pm
A federal appeals court undermined more than a century of First Amendment law by upholding a gag order that kept X—formerly known as Twitter—from discussing the government’s demand for Donald Trump’s account data, EFF argued in a brief urging a re-hearing. [read post]
