Search for: "People v. Phillips" Results 761 - 780 of 915
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
by Collin, Dallas and Denton County DWI Attorney Troy Burleson If you have been charged with a Collin, Dallas or Denton county DWI, chances are you were asked to do field tests by the officer who arrested you. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 9:36 pm by Amanda Anderson
This scheme became known as “sewer service,” and it’s unclear how many people were affected by this fraudulent practice. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
The seminar, ""Future Plans: next steps for trade marks in Europe", was launched only mid-day yesterday, but now has more than 60 people registered to attend on the afternoon of Tuesday 5 April at the London office of law firm Simmons & Simmons. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
That's very gratifying when we consider that every one of these people is or was sufficiently interested in IP to want to receive news of all its posts. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
People who had to figure out a way to pay for their mortgage, education, retirement, and so on. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Barry Sookman
Here is my submission to the INDU Committee conducting the s.92 review of the Copyright Act. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by Svetlana S. Gans and Natalie Hausknecht
 The announcement states the FTC intends to explore rules “cracking down” on the “business of collecting, analyzing, and profiting from information about people. [read post]