Search for: "People v. Sheets"
Results 761 - 780
of 908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm
Turning, then, to remedies, Judge Kessler expressed some disappointment that the Circuit Court had taken off the table the “disgorgement” remedy, and she found that the Circuit Court ruling also had kept her from requiring the industry to carry on a national program to encourage people to stop smoking, and a public education campaign and counter-marketing program to discourage people from starting to smoke, as well as a specific plan to reduce youth smoking and to… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Your ad makes fun of overweight people: respond to the complaint. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 12:20 am
Back in 1834, the Supreme Court decided in Wheaton v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:04 pm
I’m posting this speech because I think what she says is important, and because I think it’s very important to see how the people that are actually in charge think about where we are and where we’re headed. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:00 am
The public trust doctrine has not been widely discussed in Canadian case law with the only significant mention being by the Supreme Court of Canada in British Columbia v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:22 pm
PSD and title V requirements at these thresholds would lead to dramatic increases in the number of required permits -- tens of thousands of PSD permits and millions of title V permits. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
In government and academia, she has shown a special capacity to bring together people with deeply held, conflicting views. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:40 am
A BP fact sheet with additional information is available here. [read post]
2 May 2010, 11:31 pm
It was decided in the House of Lords in 1985, in a case called Street v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:27 pm
In today’s case (Gignac v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
See Schriber-Schroth Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
See Schriber-Schroth Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
As a result of the vague standards set out in the statute the courts have developed a test to determine whether a nonprofit hospital is entitled to tax exemption.[7] The test was first articulated in Methodist Old Peoples Home v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 1:21 pm
Army Corps of Engineers in 2001 and Rapanos v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
Committee Comments Effective December 1, 1997 In Cantu v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
PHA Lighting Design, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
(§4.1(v)). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:35 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Green v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:35 am
[Yes, another Padilla v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 12:57 pm
Here is the full text of the opinion in Padilla v. [read post]
