Search for: "Poole v. United States"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am
The Court observed that “the ‘primary legal consequence’ of pooling” is “that production anywhere on a pooled unit is treated as production on every tract in the unit. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:09 am
In their landmark 2008 case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am
Pool Case number: 13-cv-00096 (United States District for the District of Utah) Case filed: July 2, 2013 Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 18, 2014 05/22/2014 08/20/2014 2014-51 SEC v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:00 am
Pools are opening (probably still a tad early for a dip in the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast states). [read post]
21 May 2014, 12:03 pm
” It also prohibits the use of any communication that is not “to, from, or about the target” but “is to or from an identifiable United States person believed to be located in the United States”—unless there is “an immediate threat to human life. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
” The name Earl Warren should ring a bell, as he would later become the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, at the time that the Court heard the Brown v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 pm
This violates the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 May 2014, 10:04 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
United Airlines, Inc., 17 Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
United States, 251 U.S. 385. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
The United States sent combat troops to Iraq for over 15-month tours, and commanders and staff officers often served in Iraq and Afghanistan for 2-3 year tours. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 1:12 pm
., 644 F.3d 604 (8th Cir. 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit rejected the defendant’s argument that a “full and conclusive” Rule 702 gatekeeping procedure was required before a trial court could certify a class action under the Federal Rules. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:31 pm
Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
United States, 13-7120 (ditto); Zivotofsky v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 11:23 am
In Yates v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
United States, 13-7120. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The so-called mandate, which was the subject of the much discussed NFIB v. [read post]
