Search for: "RECORD v. RECORD"
Results 761 - 780
of 72,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 2:11 am
Regina v G (Terrorism: Information); Regina v J (terrorism: Information) House of Lords “To secure a conviction, the prosecution was not required to show that a defendant had had a terrorist purpose for collecting or recording information of a kind likely to be useful to a terrorist or possessing a document or record containing information of that [...] [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:06 am
But the Supreme Court has left open—in cases like US v Knotts and US v Jones—the argument that there’s a crucial distinction between happening to overhear something, and pervasive surveillance. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
Pierce v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Medtronic Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:49 am
She wants the money that criminal defendants pay in court costs to directly benefit the court system.The First Court panel deciding Peraza v. [read post]
New Article: The Prison to Homelessness Pipeline: Criminal Record Checks, Race, and Disparate Impact
18 Jan 2019, 6:10 am
The guidance is particularly timely, given that HUD issued a rule clarifying the burden of proof in disparate impact cases in 2013 and the Supreme Court affirmed that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act in its 2015 decision in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 3:35 am
In Capitol v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:44 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:17 am
Related Cases: Uniloc v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 10:34 am
FOI and medical records of the deceasedIn Mrs P Bluck v Information Commissioner and Epsom and St Helier University NHS Trust, the Information Tribunal has ruled that the medical records of a deceased person are exempt under section 41 (breach of confidence) of the FOI Act. [read post]
30 May 2020, 4:34 am
The case, Elleby v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:00 pm
That was the issue the court decided in CSEA v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:00 am
Capital C Infringement of Capitol Records EMI April Music Inc. v. 4MM Games, LLC, 2014 WL 1383468 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Memorandum Opinion […] [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 5:02 am
The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued its decision in Patriot Resorts Corp v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:22 pm
The cell-site records count as a “record concerning an electronic communication service” under 18 U.S.C. 2703(c). [read post]
6 May 2014, 3:21 pm
At issue in the case, Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 7:29 am
In this case, United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:04 pm
The case is Blue Spike v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 2:47 pm
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:28 am
Accordingly, Registe is not entitled to challenge the release of phone records in this case on 4th Amendment grounds.Registe v. [read post]
