Search for: "ROBERT JONES v. THE STATE" Results 761 - 780 of 938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 6:58 am by Dan Bressler
An actual conflict exists where an attorney has ‘divided and incompatible loyalties within the same matter necessarily preclusive of single-minded advocacy,’ whereas a potential conflict is one that may never be realized (People v Cortez, 22 NY3d 1061, 1068 [2014]). [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Riley, 14-1472, and Jones v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:54 am
 Davd Roberts is the new Chairman of the UK Intellectual Property Office Steering Board. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:13 am by Matthew Scarola
Supreme Court will decide whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state-law rulings that class-action bans are unconscionable. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
HarrisDocket: 10-224Issue(s): (1) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that a “presumption against preemption” requires a “narrow interpretation” of the Federal Meat Inspection Act's express preemption provision, in conflict with this Court's decision in Jones v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
” Randall Scott Jones v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:33 am by Lyle Denniston
Roberts, Jr., was clearly one of the most important church-state rulings that the Court had issued since its 1990 ruling, in a case involving a Native American church ritual of smoking peyote. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources ‘Into the Bowels of Hell’ Examining Online Defamation Law Through the Twitter Account of James Woods, Southern Law Journal Volume XXIX (2)- Fall 2019, Jessica Magaldi, Pace University, Wade Davis, Minnesota State University Mankato Journalistic Exemption under the European Data Protection Law, Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis, Policy Paper Series, 2020, Natalija Bitiukova, Human Rights Monitoring Institute The First Amendment and the Right(s) of… [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am by INFORRM
” The ECtHR stated that Article 8 did not apply, as “the underlying reasons for the applicant’s dismissal from work were sufficiently linked to his private life. [read post]