Search for: "Redding v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 5,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2022, 1:56 pm by Unknown
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation (State Court Jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Nguyen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:57 pm
Re the list of briefs in Monday's oral argument in State of Indiana v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 6:32 am
” On the other hand, consumers would perceive respondent’s Red, White, and Blue Fence Post Mark as referring to “the national colors of the United States of America, or the flag of the United States of America. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:11 pm by Walter James
The forts witness was then called in theenvironmental crimes trial of U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Pacifica Foundation (1978) and Red Lion Broadcasting v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 1:47 am
Redbox Automated Retail, LLC (Redbox) has built a growing business renting DVDs for only $1 per day from their bright red kiosks. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 7:52 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[The bill cuts health care funding in states that refused to accept the ACA's Medicaid expansion in ways that might violate NFIB v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am by Robert Chesney
An interesting Afghanistan habeas decision today, from the UK:  Yunus Ramhmatullah v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm by Howard Wasserman
Kennedy states that Rose's Hall-of-Fame worthiness has come under "renewed discussion" as players linked to PED use (Mark McGwire, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens) come up for Hall consideration. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing  Matter of Sadallah v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 160 AD3d 1482, the Appellate Division found that the ALJ's determination was supported by substantial evidence, observing that "Evidence which would not be admissible in a court, such as hearsay, is admissible in a departmental hearing"* and "if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence". [read post]