Search for: "SB v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2019, 11:33 am
SB 23 is one of the most aggressive, oppressive, and radical attacks against women ever seen in this state and this country. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:03 pm
Yes, it’s time to roll out Nix v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 pm
SBS Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 1:55 pm
” SB: “No. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
How much of a chilling effect do SB 8-style laws really impose? [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
In terms of new developments, OPR is moving forward with its CEQA Guidelines implementing SB 226 (infill streamlining). [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm
Likely in response to the California Supreme Court’s December 23, 2016 ruling in Augustus v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 8:51 pm
Similarly, a person charged with a state jail felony prostitution case (who does does not a previous conviction for that state jail offense) must be placed on probation. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:25 am
But they are gaining traction across the state, especially with the introduction of SB 1112, filed by state Sen. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:08 pm
By Cori Badgley In Gray v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
United States of America (Immigration, SB 1070) Merits brief in Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:12 pm
California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
SB 1162 would make all of that data public. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:18 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
Very late in last year’s session, the legislature took action to address some of these concerns by enacting SB 617 (Calderon) to impose additional requirements on state agency rulemaking. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 12:33 pm
”Ormco Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
SB 271 will allow temporary or transitory employment performed outside of California to count towards unemployment benefits as long as the individual is a California resident, is hired and dispatched from the state, and intends to return to the state to seek reemployment following the outside-California work. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:06 pm
SB-10-0036-D. [read post]
