Search for: "Sellers v. United States"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2023, 12:51 pm
Media Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:29 am
Federal Trade Commission, 3:24-cv-986, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, filed April 23, 2024; Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
” See United States v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:56 am
One of the standout allegations from the FTC’s brief: “1-800 Contacts is consistently the highest-priced seller on the internet, and consumers do not know it. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
The United States Supreme Court weighed the Right of Publicity against first amendment rights in the case of Zacchini v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:46 am
– Class counsel in the Keepseagle v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
United States, where the Supreme Court construed a federal statute criminalizing possession of a firearm in the United States by “any person…who has been convicted in any court. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
A: this is just blockbusters/biggest sellers in the country. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:28 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reviews jury instructions for which a timely objection is lacking for fundamental error. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
We also await the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
The oral argument yesterday morning in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm
United States, 17-8 Issues: (1) Whether a tribe that opted out of the Indian Reorganization Act can have its status under the Act revived under the Indian Land Consolidation Act, 25 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
The rule, as drafted, would prohibit employers throughout the United States from relying on or enforcing covenants to not compete. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:07 am
Terms that imply that the UCC applies include phrases such as “purchase order,” “buyer,” “seller,” “vendor,” “manufacturer,” “quantity,” “product description,” “unit price,” and “defects in workmanship and materials. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 pm
Mark Lift Indus., Inc., 366 S.C. 308, 622 S.E.3d 213 (2005) addressed this issue in a certified question from the United States District Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
By Dennis Crouch Nordock v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:31 am
United States, 16-9649, Richter v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
Hugunin v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Cohen as income to the New York State tax authorities. [read post]
