Search for: "State v. B. T."
Results 761 - 780
of 18,442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) The DC Circuit has just noted on its docket that it has denied rehearing in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 3:13 am
Higbee Co., 319 F.3d 825, 829 (6th Cir.2003) (en banc) (quoting United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am
In view of the interest in this ruling by State Supreme Court Judge Joan B. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am
In view of the interest in this ruling by State Supreme Court Judge Joan B. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:03 pm
United States, 556 U.S.___ (2009) and Arizona v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Ryan LLC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:38 pm
Rev. 139 (1984); see also Colonel Ted B. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm
§ 3621(b) to decide whether federal sentences are to be served in a state or federal facility. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 10:37 am
The Ninth Circuit holds that the voter-initiated Measure B doesn't violate the First Amendment. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
" The court said that the text “also suggests that an employee need not also report to an external agency” and the legislative history states that "[t]he employee receives the same protection when giving this notice [to the appointing authority] as if he or she had disclosed information to a governmental body. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
P. 72(b)(3). [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:46 am
In Knight v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:04 am
[State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am
One story that often comes up is conflicts b/t groups and members of the group. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
In Geier v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:25 am
And here's my summary of his dicta:Howes v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
§511(b). [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
§511(b). [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 11:00 pm
New Jersey resident Nelson Obus contested a New York State Department of Taxation and Finance determination which found that he owed taxes for maintaining a residential property in the state.Obus filed an administrative review proceeding, pursuant CPLR Article 78, to challenge the determination, but because it was found to be “rational,” and “supported by substantial evidence,” the finding of was upheld by a Tax Appeals Tribunal.Under Tax Law § 605… [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:37 pm
In Calvary Albuquerque Inc. v. [read post]
