Search for: "State v. Board of Education" Results 761 - 780 of 5,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
The unions initially sued in federal court challenging the constitutionality of the wage freeze under the Contracts and Takings Clauses of the United States Constitution but were unsuccessful [Buffalo Teachers Fedn. v Tobe, 446 F Supp 2d 134, affd 464 F3d 362, cert denied, 127 S Ct 2133]. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 2:39 pm
In short, the court stated that Defendants were attempting to impose Revlon duties, as applied to Maryland law in Shenker v. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 4:51 pm by Rebecca Johnson
From 2021 to 2024, he represented District 1 on the State Bar of Texas Board of Directors. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by CAFE
Board of Education, 1954 SCOTUS decisions concerning the death penalty: Furman v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:55 am by Nikki Siesel
The Board stated that it would base its decision on the least sophisticated potential purchaser. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 11:00 am by Native American Rights Fund
EPA (Clean Air Act, tribal power plants)    * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlSisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:04 pm
The Higher Education Board announced that it would follow Lynch's advice. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:10 am by Howard Knopf
 These include questions about the “Premium” and “Choice” offerings and the state of AC’s licensing negotiations.It is also notable that Mr. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Consultant’s breach of contract claim rejected as time barred and for failure to state a cause of actionKyer v Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk Cent. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Board of Education held that the establishment clause applies to state and local governments, all nine justices accepted this metaphor of a wall separating church and state as reflecting the commitment of the First Amendment. [read post]