Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 761 - 780
of 29,591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted directly or indirectly… [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 9:24 am
When the Supreme Court in 1992 decided Planned Parenthood of Southeast Pennsylvania v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
Notably, the Court of Appeal stated that subsequent case law, including Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] UKHL 22, has placed greater emphasis on the need to view planning permissions as a whole rather than as consent for delineable acts of development. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:11 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:32 am
Jobs, Apple’s chief executive, finally plans to make the iPhone available on Verizon Wireless, the largest wireless carrier in the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 10:51 am
So held the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Bafford v. [read post]
14 Dec 2012, 11:44 am
The case is entitled Oxford Health Plan LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:33 am
In Motiva v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:28 pm
In City of San Diego v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:07 am
That decision, Harris v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 2:00 am
In 2004, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals (in Matz v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:18 am
The Court of Appeals of Iowa faced this question in Bronner v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:31 pm
Alabama, which was consolidated with Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:34 pm
Last Friday, on behalf of several veterans and other interested citizens, we brought suit against various State officials challenging Hawaii's 2012 Reapportionment Plan. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
In Heimeshoff v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:14 am
State courts in California and Michigan have refused to stay discovery, while a Connecticut state court reached the opposite conclusion in City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits Plan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
The June 28, 2012 Supreme Court National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:42 am
Many of our readers are aware that the United States Supreme Court recently overturned Roe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 4:36 am
Treatment of Marriages of Same-Sex Couples for Retirement Plan PurposesThe IRS has issued Notice 2014-19, which provides guidance on how qualified retirement plans should treat the marriages of same-sex couples following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
