Search for: "State v. Queen" Results 761 - 780 of 2,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
This was the question facing the UK Information Tribunal recently in Queen Mary University of London v (1) The Information Commissioner and (2) Alem Matthees. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:37 am by Doorey
  In this Guest Blog, Craig Bavis describes the state of that argument. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
The Court of Appeals  then took up the facts in the case, explaining that Gilberto Vallee is anative of Forest Hills, Queens. [read post]
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
He stated that this evidence clearly identified 138 persons who had been removed from the Gift Lake Membership List by the Registrar of the Metis Settlements Land Registry. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
Lee" or by the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v White. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 5:16 pm
They were not yet legally married, and the will did not contain a clause stating it was in contemplation of marriage. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:09 am
A more recent decision on FRAND royalty calculation is Ericsson Inc v D-Link Sys., Inc 773 F. 3d 1201 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 8:00 pm by Hannah Roskey
A recent decision of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, Suncor Energy Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Open Rights group has published their first impressions of the Digital Economy Bill, which was revealed in the Queen’s Speech 2016. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Supreme Court –Queens County, New York:  People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:46 am by Harold O'Grady
One of the first decisions to address the question was Rutgers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:27 am by Jeff Gamso
 I'm talking about the Honorable Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.'s Opinion and Order in United States v. [read post]