Search for: "State v. Rose" Results 761 - 780 of 2,620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2018, 1:10 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
The Civil Procedure Rules and the case of Chesters Accommodation Agency v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
Four pages of his 2010 ten-page job application stressed that he was qualified for the state’s highest court because he played football at the University of Iowa, including an appearance in a Rose Bowl game. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am by CMS
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am by Anushka Limaye
Rose, Jim Miller, Elaine Kamarck and Maya MacGuineas will be on the panel. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Daily Record Staff
Rose was sentenced to five years’ incarceration. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
In Regeneron v Kymab (IPKat post here), a patent was found enabled and thus sufficiently disclosed despite the example methods provided in the specification being unworkable at the time of the invention. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Florida; must include consideration of the whole record, Rose v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the United States, suicide rates rose by 25% in the past two decades reaching 45,000 deaths per year. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
Since the landmark UK Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48), judges of the lower courts have voiced the need for clarification from the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  A v Switzerland, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2018). [read post]