Search for: "State v. Sherman" Results 761 - 780 of 1,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
While the Sherman Act would often ban these types of practices, states are immune from antitrust scrutiny as a matter of federalism—a concept referring to the constitutional division of power between federal and states actors. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
Green (University of Mississippi - School of Law) has posted McDonald v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kiran Bhat
Holder and Florence v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am by Sean Wajert
Sherman, 515 A.2d 1327 (Pa. 1986); Nelson v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” At In These Times, James Gray Pope and others look at approaches to “rebuilding labor after the Supreme Court’s … ruling” in Janus v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:53 pm
On April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 10:16 pm
The Complaint cites law in California, including the Sherman Antitrust Act (the Australian equivalent is the Trade Practices Act 1974). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The plaintiffs aggregation theory is reminiscent of the 1949 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 6:00 am
State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519, 528 (1983); see also Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. [read post]