Search for: "Supervisors v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 1,709
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
’” His conduct was also sufficiently reprehensible to qualify for punitive damages under state law (Marlo v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
His supervisors confronted him with allegations of mismanagement, reassigned him to “Emergency Placement in Off-Duty Status,” and suspended his pay. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
The H-2B non-agricultural temporary worker program allows U.S. employers to bring foreign nationals to the United States to fill temporary non-agricultural jobs. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
During this leave, she claimed that her supervisor called her several times at home to discuss work-related matters and upon her return from leave retaliated against her by issuing negative reviews and reprimands and reassigning her to another unit. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:59 am by Joy Waltemath
The EEOC filed the Washington suit in 2011 against two growers and a corporation, Global, that brought Thai workers to the United States to work on their farms and orchards. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 10:06 am by Sean Kirby
On February 11, 2015, the Supreme Court of New Jersey expressly adopted the test created by the United States Supreme Court in Faragher v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:18 pm
First, some initial points: Officers of the United States — defined as those who exercise significant authority of the United States — have to have sworn an oath and received a commission from the President. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:58 pm by Sean Hanover
United States, 356 U.S. 369, 383 (1958) (Justice Frankfurter concurring); United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
The lawsuit raises important questions about the legal and jurisdictional relation between drainage districts and county governments, in part, because some districts are managed by county supervisors who also serve as trustees for the districts. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
It relied on the CEQA Guidelines’ Class 3 exemption for “new, small facilities or structures” including “[o]ne single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone” (14 Cal. [read post]