Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 761 - 780
of 4,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
In Barr v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am
Amanda Shanor analyzes Monday’s decision in Barr v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
In any case, Price v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:01 am
* F&C, having proved its case, was entitled to injunctive relief, money, delivery up of infringing material and presumably anything else it fancied. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:03 am
* F&C, having proved its case, was entitled to injunctive relief, money, delivery up of infringing material and presumably anything else it fancied. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am
Design patent v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:39 am
Case citation: POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:29 am
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) has been making news of late, with the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:10 am
Sony * Anti-Spyware Company Protected by 47 USC 230(c)(2)--Zango v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
Tershakovec v. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
Del. 2006) (the “no threshold model . . . flies in the face of the toxicological law of dose-response . . . doesn’t satisfy Daubert, and doesn’t stand up to scientific scrutiny”); Cano v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 6:10 am
By Eric Goldman Verizon California, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
” This kind of stuff makes my head hurt, because the court seems to imply that Amazon could avoid liability by taking fewer steps to protect consumer safety. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
I can't let this story go on falsely anymore, Jerad and Amanda Miller didn't do shit, they were outcasts of the group, but they brought us the attention we needed. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 8:06 am
Rice v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:32 am
[This is probably best understood as a normative version of “reasonable consumers wouldn’t be confused. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 9:13 am
updates us on another landmark judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in C‑582/14 Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland concerning the proper characterisation of IP addresses and the compatibility of German national law with Article 7(f) of the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:40 am
Sept. 30, 2014) Related posts: Android ID Isn’t Personally Identifiable Information Under the Video Privacy Protection Act Washington State Supreme Court Hears an Interesting Privacy Case: Dillon v. [read post]
