Search for: "The Public Employment Law Press"
Results 761 - 780
of 6,944
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2023, 6:33 am
On February 21, 2023, the NLRB issued its opinion in McLaren Macomb and corresponding press release, Board Rules that Employers May Not Offer Severance Agreements Requiring Employees to Broadly Waive Labor Law Rights.The case involved the following provisions in separation agreements offered to 11 permanently furloughed bargaining unit employees:6. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 3:44 am
The Court argued that the Subsecretary of Public Health, as well as the pharmaceutical companies, failed to prove a pressing concern or probable harm and with sufficient specificity to the national interest or to public health. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:22 pm
Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you receive future updates by registering on our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:58 pm
Organizations and their leaders risk, federal criminal liability from violations of an ever-growing multitude of federal tax, securities, cyber liability, labor and employment, safety, environmental and other laws. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:27 pm
Offences relating to unlawful assembly are found in Part II of the Criminal Code relating to “Offences Against Public Order”. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
But other public officials like mayors and city council members were not included, leaving lobbyists free to continue giving them tickets, meals, and other items. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 1:00 am
In that regard, punitive damages for IPRs infringements have found their places in, but not limited to, China’s Civil Code (CCC), Copyright Law, Trade Mark Law and Patent Law (see former IPKat posts here and here).This post discusses a recent patent case in which the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC) awarded punitive damages upon post-settlement-agreement repeated infringement.Shelly: 'Oops! [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:02 pm
Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you receive future updates by registering on our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:14 am
I am not a labor and employment law expert. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
As workplace issues have become more complex, human resource professionals and managers often turn to employment lawyers for advice in sorting out matters involving the interaction between business requirements and the requirements of employment laws and regulations. [read post]
SEC’s Brings an “S”-Related ESG Enforcement Action Based on Alleged Human Capital Control Violations
20 Feb 2023, 6:39 pm
The SEC’s February 3, 2023, Press Release about the settlement can be found here. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
Surveillance Duke University School of Law professor Nita Farahany has explained to The Wall Street Journal how employers are increasingly using neurotechnology to monitor employees, and how privacy law has failed to keep up. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:02 pm
About Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
The fact that this will require an employer to take down a sign reading "White Applicants Only" hardly means that the law should be analyzed as one regulating the employer's speech rather than conduct. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 8:22 am
If Commissioner Bedoya’s remarks are an indication of where the commission is going, the public comments appear not to have moved the needle at all and served largely as a backdrop for the FTC to press ahead with its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”). [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 8:02 am
I asked the AI a series of legal questions related to Ontario employment law. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 4:50 am
Under the bill, the Division of Consumer Affairs within the Department of Law and Public Safety will oversee enhanced certification requirements for temporary help service firms. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 2:39 pm
The Australian Government is seeking to address this issue and, as a result, has made some significant changes to Australia’s employment laws. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:26 am
About Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
Instead of pressing for change in the contents of the basic laws, critics of the constitutional revolution challenged the interpretation given to these basic laws by the Supreme Court. [read post]
