Search for: "US v. Coats" Results 761 - 780 of 1,081
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2011, 5:55 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
: non-government schools are more likely to get students into university government schools http://j.mp/okLOyW mashable presents "A Brief History of the Emoticon" http://j.mp/odrffj this is an interesting development: "Lawyers in Murray trial using Facebook, Twitter to screen jurors" http://j.mp/qWD2YP steve martin has some advice for eddie murphy: "An Open Letter to Eddie Murphy" http://j.mp/ruhhoA but it's not very stylish: "Rufus Roo: a… [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
Hence we feel it incumbent on us to reiterate that Article 136 was never meant to be an ordinary forum of appeal at all like Section 96 or even Section 100 CPC. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:47 am
The '210 patent describes a method of coating substrates such as those used in catalytic converters. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Coates, IV Harvard Law School Date Posted: August 23, 2011Working Paper Series76 downloadsAbstract: An important set of contract terms manages potential disputes. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
During last year's weeks of seasonal transition, the AmeriKat was writing about the impending first sale doctrine US Supreme Court ruling in the Omega v Costco case. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
"David Bernstein, Yves Saint Laurent's lawyer (and yes it appears to be the very same from the Bacardi battle reported here), stated that "This was a trademark that never should've been issued...YSL has been using red since the 1970s, other designers have used red on the soles of their shoes. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
  The good idea was using the argument that the Turner court hadn’t had the benefit of the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:31 am by Marie Louise
: Cour d’Appel Paris decision in Teva v Eli Lilly (Kluwer Patent Blog) US: CAFC confirms that isolated DNA may be patented: Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:28 am by Ted Frank
[Wajert; Fisher @ Forbes; Patch v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- As discussed yesterday, a panel of the Federal Circuit seemingly expanded the scope of the written description requirement in its Boston Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
The technology relates to drug-eluting coronary artery stents, used to reduce restenosis after angioplasty. [read post]