Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 761 - 780
of 4,282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2016, 2:27 pm
The United States as amicus curiae suggested a test, see Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 27–29, but Samsung and Apple did not brief the issue. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:43 pm
On October 22, 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the ’087 patent, entitled “Instrument for Treating an Ocular Disorder. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
Trump v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:56 pm
United States, 530 U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:56 am
Supreme Court copyright case:"Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:49 am
The court ruled in Sanchez v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
United States Howes v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:26 pm
On June 13, 2011, the Supreme Court for the State of New York, Appellate Division, issued an opinion in the case of Bank of New York v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
The 1953 case in which the Supreme Court established it, United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm
The arguments The United States contends that, because the statute is ambiguous and the BIA’s interpretation is reasonable, that interpretation is entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 10:24 am
Alsup of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has just entered a case management and mediation order in the high-profile copyright litigation between Oracle, the Java right holder, and Google, which has been using Java in Android for about eight years without a license.The trial date will be set at a later time and most likely be March 28, 2016 or September 12, 2016, but it could also be anytime in between. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The post Mohawk Tribe v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:13 am
Since the United States Supreme Court first addressed the patentability of computer software in Gottschalk v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:43 am
So while patients in the United States have access to testing for Long QT Syndrome through six laboratories in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, Canadians must send samples to the United States to be tested, at a cost of more than $4,000 per test. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm
On the trademark front, the law is more complicated and depends on whether the merchandise is materially different than the products sold in the United States and on whether the trademark was applied outside the United States under the control or ownership of the U.S. trademark holder. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:25 am
require registrants for usTLDs to have a substantial nexus with the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:08 am
Federal Election Commission, United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
