Search for: "United States v. Rose" Results 761 - 780 of 1,231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
In addition, law schools outside of Canada seek to serve the market for legal education in Canada, with Arizona State University seeking to grant a “North American law degree” to qualify graduates to practise law in both Canada and the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
Al- Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 - Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” for the purpose of refusing refugee status, two applicants lose appeal. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
Rose, “Establishing Causation with Epidemiology,” in Tee L. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am by Ronald Mann
Moments after Joshua Rosenkranz (arguing for Kirtsaeng) started to present his argument, Justice Ginsburg stopped him to express her concern that the regime he proposed (“universal exhaustion,” as she termed it) would have the United States giving more limited rights to copyright owners than any other country in the world. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Glenn
Even if they are correct, the parties pressing for government antitrust action against Google cannot claim the courts have ever recognized the concept of natural monopoly as a surrogate for the United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:10 am by Todd Ruger
The hearing will also include testimony from Anthony Johnstone, a University of Montana School of Law assistant professor who was Montana Solicitor when he drafted an amicus brief for 26 states in the campaign finance challenge of Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 7:37 am by Anders Walker
  Even though moderates did co-opt ideas advanced by figures on the Left, conservatives and moderates alike did much to crush any formal socialist politics in the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
The trial court ruled against the parish in 2010, the Connecticut Supreme Court upheld the trial court's decision in September 2011, and the United States Supreme Court declined to review that decision earlier this year.The opinion by the Supreme Court of Connecticut is a travesty of justice -- it nonsensically reads the United States Supreme Court's majority decision in Jones v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am by Barry Friedman
To state the obvious, if the “principle” bloom was off the Supreme Court rose in 1970, it has pretty much stayed off. [read post]