Search for: "United States v. Sample"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,783
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2015, 1:59 pm
See, e.g., Murphy v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
The implement or machine becomes [the purchaser’s] private, individual property, not protected by the laws of the United States, but by the laws of the State in which it is situated. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:37 am
It is in this context of a shortage of donor sperm that the newly issued Application of Aziz M v Attorney General of Canada is being litigated. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 8:36 am
We have provided some sample language for New York State purchasers to read and understand. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 8:36 am
We have provided some sample language for New York State purchasers to read and understand. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:05 am
Because the margin of error depends inversely on the square root of the sample size, large populations (such as that of the United States) are often represented by a sample size of 1,000 – representing far less than 1% of the population. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:19 am
In People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
The 22nd Amendment to the United States Constitution limits the number of times a person can be elected to the office of President of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
UPDATE: You may have heard the cheers emanating from Bentonville, Arkansas (the location of Wal-Mart's corporate headquarters), and the corporate headquarters of other large employers following the United States Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision in Wal-Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:18 pm
The majority relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:41 am
Chevron Deference In this lesson, we explore issues relating to the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:33 am
Indeed, the United States Supreme Court has held that when a defendant’s blood was taken without a warrant or his consent, the blood-test results were inadmissible. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:06 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:25 pm
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:50 pm
A United States Secret Service Special Agent with training in identifying counterfeit currency opined that the inkjet printer, linen paper, and acetone were items used in the manufacturing of counterfeit currency. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:42 am
Susan V. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 10:03 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, 653 F.3d 1329 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 8:15 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
