Search for: "United States v. State of New Jersey" Results 761 - 780 of 3,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 1:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
From the decisionHigh Point SARL (“High Point”) appeals the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey holding that its patent rights were exhausted by the authorized sales of telecommunications infrastructure equipment substantially embodying the asserted claims of U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:06 am by Spencer Persson
BMS is a Delaware corporation that maintains substantial operations in both New York and New Jersey. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:30 pm
On February 9, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that an arbitrator, rather than a judge, must decide whether an arbitration agreement allows the parties to have a class action arbitration. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:00 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
The Unites States District Court for the District of New Jersey applied a relatively narrow definition of “employee. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:57 am
Hochberg, District Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, was sitting by designation, a decision of ND Cal was affirmed and Apotex lost.As to standards of analysis:The determination of infringement is a two-step process, wherein the court first construes the claims and then determines whether every claim limitation, or its equivalent, is found in the accused device. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:04 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The federal law at issue was the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), which is law in every state, including New Jersey. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
In a recent decision, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey held that an offer to settle a debt can include an optional payment date that falls within the time in which the consumer can dispute the debt. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:53 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
In a recent decision, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey held that an offer to settle a debt can include an optional payment date that falls within the time in which the consumer can dispute the debt. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:05 am by Howard Friedman
Executive Office United States Marshals, 2011 U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:37 pm
To the author’s knowledge, this is the first case in the United States that has addressed this particular issue. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:08 am
.: 3-15407Case filed: August 6, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: August 6, 2013 8/6/2013 11/4/2013 2013-63 William Graulich, IV and iVest International Holdings, Inc.Case number: 09-cv-4355 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case filed: August 26, 2009Qualifying judgment/order: June 19,… [read post]