Search for: "Van Order v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 1,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2017, 5:25 am by Richard Hunt
See, “A bipartisan solution to stopping drive-by lawsuits” ** There is an excellent survey of the law on standing in an ADA context in the recent decision Van Winkle v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 2:44 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In this regard, the UK Supreme Court’s recent landmark decisions in Vedanta v Lungowe and Okpabi v Shell have granted jurisdiction and allowed such claims to proceed on the merits in the English courts. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm by Andrew Frisch
Van Elk, Ltd., 148 Cal.App. 4th 604, 611 (2007), where the court stated that: Thus, as presented to this court, this case does not involve a situation where undocumented workers submitted false work authorization documents to a prospective employer. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Just before the Christmas break, however, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
 Interestingly, he did not go into detail about the required duration or complexity of such action in order for it to qualify.The US Copyright Office stated that the dance was “too simple”. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:25 pm by Einer Elhauge
Finally, it was to me remarkable that Scalia, Thomas, and Alito were willing to so blithely say it would be perfectly sensible to interpret Obamacare to threaten to withhold tax credits in order to induce states to create exchanges. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
See Town Versus Gown Fight Continues Over State University EIR. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Defense counsel’s forged email confirms non-compliance with multiple discovery orders and warrants terminating sanctions: FURminator v PetVac (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Answer regarding whether a test was performed does not violate privilege: Itex, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Norris, a case in which the inmate lost, in order to argue that the inmate should lose for a different reason (procedural default). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am by Law Lady
Revocable Trust, KATHY JO VAN, as trustee of the Kathy Jo Van Revocable Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am by Adam Wagner
In Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v Belgium (1981) 4 EHRR 1, the ECtHR contrasted proceedings which are “directly decisive” of the right in question, to which article 6 applies, with those which have a “tenuous” or “remote” consequence. [read post]