Search for: "WIT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. US " Results 761 - 780 of 1,241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
 The IPKat's resident expert in the affairs of the higher echelons of the British judiciary informs him that litigation in the UK in the honest concurrent use dispute of Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnick v  Anheuser-Busch Inc (noted by the IPKat here) is not going any further. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am by Mary Dwyer
I’m Ready Productions, Inc.12-803Issue: Whether 17 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia:  In the case of Google Inc v ACCC ([2013] HCA 1) the High Court of Australia held that Google was not liable for engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct as a result of the production of sponsored links. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by ADaigle
Lake Holiday Property Owners Association, Inc. holding that associations have a right to enforce speed limits on their private streets by using a security guard to pull speeders over and issue citations. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  Although BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
… Courts are reluctant to second-guess a tribunal's decision not to hold an oral hearing and will generally only intervene to prevent manifest unfairness: Xwave Solutions Inc v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  A witness for the Association for Justice indicated that the language would eliminate 411-Pain and 1-800-ASK GARY’s ability to do business in the state. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:11 am by Schachtman
Werner Enterprises, Inc., Civ. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Disney won the contest of its trademark rights over the Winnie the Pooh characters against Stephen Slesinger Inc. before the US Appeals Court. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:58 am by Schachtman
  See Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence at 599 n. 141 (describing cases in which purported expert witnesses attempted to use Bradford Hill factors in the absence of a statistically significant association; citing Rains v. [read post]