Search for: "Wagner v. Wagner" Results 761 - 780 of 1,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 8:20 am by David Hart QC
Sadly, the judgment is still not available on an open access website such as Bailli – bless it, per Adam Wagner’s post- but I hope that will change soon. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am by Ed Bates, University of Southampton
It may well have been that differences of opinion on that debate lay behind the majority and minority opinions in Hirst v United Kingdom back in 2005. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
The review’s findings have mostly backed the status quo (a summary by Adam Wagner can be found here). [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Adam Wagner’s October 19th post on Sir Scott Baker’s Extradition Review Panel report  noted that the document “mostly backed the status quo,” calling attention to its rejection of proposed reforms to the  “forum bar” rule, the US/UK Treaty, and the lack of a  prima facie case requirement. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
  See Adam Wagner’s post on the Court of Appeal’s ruling  and the decision of the Divisional Court. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
 October 3, 2011 Adam Wagner Filed under: In the news, Roundup Tagged: human rights [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:47 am by Rosalind English
The influence of a “graduated approach to proportionality” had two benefits; it took root in society without being perceived as being imposed from above, and it even influenced Strasbourg case law – see for example the extensive quotations from Lord Bingham’s judgments in Pretty v DPP when the Strasbourg Courts came to consider the case in Pretty v United Kingdom. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:57 pm by Tan Mau Wu
Wagner and Petherbridge on Phillips and Horowitz on copyright remain popular, but the rest are new. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am by INFORRM
When considering the Metropolitan Police’s attempt to force a Guardian journalist to disclose her source, it is worth revisiting the seminal case of R v Shayler [2002] UKHL 11. [read post]