Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 21,861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am
“Nevertheless, plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the account stated claim cannot be granted as to the other amounts billed, because plaintiff has not demonstrated entitlement to dismissal of defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaims, which are sufficiently intertwined with the account stated claim so as to provide a bona fide defense (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept… [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
The first was Gill v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:03 pm
Among those present from the other side of the case, defending Wisconsin’s map, are state Attorney General Brad Schimel, a Republican, and state Sen. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
With the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
Morris, and NLRB v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:05 am
Velte, Why the Religious Right Can't Have Its (Straight Wedding) Cake and Eat It Too: Breaking the Preservation-Through-Transformation Dynamic in Masterpiece Cakeshop V. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
Max Hill v Mail on Sunday, A Man v The Gazette (Paisley) Ward v Mail on Sunday. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 11:13 am
NFIB v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:45 pm
The bill would also protect the right to abortion in Illinois — even if the unthinkable happens and Roe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:09 pm
Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:09 pm
Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:41 am
In its decision in March 1925 in Carroll v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:46 am
Sabrina McCubbin posted the court documents from the consolidated cases under Dalmazzi v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:02 am
Evans v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:09 pm
In a case decided earlier this year, DirecTV v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 10:31 am
It is black-letter law, under United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 6:08 pm
Lackie, 2017 ONCA 716 Cobb v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 10:12 am
Perry, from 1974, and Menna v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:36 am
Schedule 6 contains modifications to be made to the GDPR articles (e.g., by changing references to member states to refer to the United Kingdom) so that they will continue to apply after Brexit. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 6:48 am
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
